From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,deac256a05c84a59
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:32:35 +0100
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@user1.uni-duisburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: DOM and SAX parsing in Ada
References: <41900010.D28DD400@boeing.com> <9CWjd.17305$5K2.1356@attbi_s03>
  <1106223415.857525.176640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
  <gemini.iaoife001pbek00hc.nick.roberts@acm.org>
  <41F4DB6F.4090909@mailinator.com>
  <gemini.iavppg0091gj502zw.nick.roberts@acm.org>
 <35nh12F4oe4caU1@individual.net>
  <gemini.iawt1w000svx202ss.nick.roberts@acm.org>
  <UPWdnYp5d-1PFmrcRVn-rA@comcast.com>
  <gemini.iaxmj2001ydde00mw.nick.roberts@acm.org>
  <mailman.94.1106783306.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
  <gemini.iazrta00fa0dd008g.nick.roberts@acm.org>
 <35t2u6F4qc335U1@individual.net>
 <gemini.iazxmw00jrr0d008g.nick.roberts@acm.org>
 <CpmdnRbVAuboNGTcRVn-qw@comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CpmdnRbVAuboNGTcRVn-qw@comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <41fa3eef$0$18554$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jan 2005 14:32:31 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7a65bc94.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=49BNNbKf1ffa1IKbSTkC[i:ejgIfPPlddjW\KbG]kaMhAV6U:Z=fE=onJn2oIPGFQb:n9G[MMWD:dU7WX^MoPmHc
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8052
Date: 2005-01-28T14:32:31+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Steve wrote:
> Actually XML/Ada does support validation, I'm using it.
> 
>     Set_Feature( tree_reader, Validation_Feature, TRUE);
> 
> I don't know whether or not the implementation is buggy, but I do know that 
> it has worked in the cases I have tested.

It's not a validating parser in the sense of XMLthough.
Denny Vrandečić explains why, in the docs about XML4Ada95.

In Get_Feature in XML/Ada,

       elsif Name = Parameter_Entities_Feature then
          return False;  --  ??? Unsupported for now
       end if;


-- georg