From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11cf:: with SMTP id n15mr3788639qtk.256.1625004753929;
        Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:bc10:: with SMTP id i16mr39662828ybh.73.1625004753759;
 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dda17a4b-bc38-4dc2-943d-31ca65b7e6efn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.200.73; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.200.73
References: <sajvdv$v2a$2@dont-email.me> <a11b1fc4-44aa-40d3-b831-2a6b0b42e735n@googlegroups.com>
 <32bca509-dba2-42ee-88bf-1eceb488a883n@googlegroups.com> <12aaec74-c32e-4ac3-b5a6-d8d9bdaad435n@googlegroups.com>
 <dda17a4b-bc38-4dc2-943d-31ca65b7e6efn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <46d6677c-dcd9-4440-9a7b-ccdce06b6666n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Exercism.io needs Ada
From: Andreas ZEURCHER <ZUERCHER_Andreas@outlook.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:12:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62302
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 3:40:46 PM UTC-5, amado...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Should not the first step be an evaluation of this site by an programming master? 
> > > Maybe this has been done; if so, please inform.
> > Define programming master in a nonAda language... 
> 
> I'm not sure I follow. Sorry if I was not clear. My focus was on an evaluation of the quality of the site overall. By some recognized authority.

Which certification agency evaluates such websites?  And what is that certification agency's rating of c.l.a?  Are ourselves passing the test with sufficient merit?

I claim that each Ada person here recognizes themselves as such an authority by having eyes and a brain.

> "Programming master" were just the words that come to mind to caracterize an authority in this case. 
>
> Again, maybe there is such an evaluation. In which case, please inform. There are many sites on everything. We cannot track them all.