From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,caabf5265fad78e5
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.velia.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:52:39 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: unsigned type
References: <59O1m.404661$4m1.69194@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <h28hpj$qvt$1@aioe.org> <1eS1m.2153$j84.1865@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <26nl0usbijt2.f3fb47lsno0o.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <26nl0usbijt2.f3fb47lsno0o.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4a488ee7$0$31870$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jun 2009 11:52:39 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6913c1c1.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=jFL46FNf^LcIkjb;<8iR=aMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa^YC2XCjHcbi_D5OTc5[VNb;9OJDO8_SKfNSZ1n^B98ij_E@W=Y^:;0b
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6700
Date: 2009-06-29T11:52:39+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov schrieb:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:34:29 -0500, Gary Scott wrote:
> 
>> tmoran@acm.org wrote:
>>
>>> Ada's equivalent is Natural.  If
>> Sorry for the naive question.  I'm curious as to the reason for the term 
>> "natural".  "Unnatural" would seem more descriptive :)
> 
> Far better than Cardinal, though. Last time I used Modula-2, its Cardinal
> didn't contain aleph-0 and aleph-1... (:-))
> 

What actually _is_ the mathematically correct word
for Ada's Natural?