From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,caabf5265fad78e5
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:15:18 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh.plus-bug.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Reply-To: rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: unsigned type
References: <MJS1m.405325$4m1.207186@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <h2919r$8ua$1@aioe.org>
 <Yw_1m.93774$d36.55288@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <t43a2h.upd.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <vl92m.407874$4m1.156974@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
In-Reply-To: <vl92m.407874$4m1.156974@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4a493cf6$0$31879$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jun 2009 00:15:18 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 6845b14f.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=3Sl>[4@977V\PS5Xo=M[RVMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ^YC2XCjHcbYL9LV2A9OikUA:ho7QcPOVSed5V2gRG2;Vm\[AE5`PSm_
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6740
Date: 2009-06-30T00:15:18+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anon wrote:
>         Wrong

No.  If authors of the current RM can't convince you,
maybe a quote from the Ada 83 edition can:

"no value belongs to a null range" (Ada 83 RM 3.5)

with all consequences...