From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2f01:: with SMTP id l1mr8926042qtd.232.1574468879867;
        Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:27:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4891:: with SMTP id
 v139mr14056938oia.175.1574468879505;
 Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!82.197.223.106.MISMATCH!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!g89no651122qtd.0!news-out.google.com!p4ni1537qtu.1!nntp.google.com!g89no651120qtd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:27:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wcca78nzcox.fsf@shell02.theworld.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=149.32.224.35;
 posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.35
References: <358a3934-7cb2-4cff-8703-71410815f27e@googlegroups.com>
 <wcca78nzcox.fsf@shell02.theworld.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4c20f9aa-56bd-4156-aee7-7fb6398b005e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Initializing an array of tasks with discrimants
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 00:27:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57597
Date: 2019-11-22T16:27:59-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 3:57:52 PM UTC-8, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Is there a particular aggregate that I can use to avoid
> > the superfluous wrapper record?
> 
> See AI12-0212-1.TXT.  Not yet implemented in GNAT,
> as far as I know.

I would add precondition to Next as

function Next return Positive with pre => Next_Value < Positive'Last;

Anh Vo