From: srOmatic <sriviere17@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ruby and Ada
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 00:40:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c7cf4de-c7aa-43d4-8756-a914ebb27e4cn@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bde60f1-0a46-470c-ae71-ccfc18fe66a1n@googlegroups.com>
I second that.
We wrote in HAC more than 10K lines of code for about 50 scripts (the biggest ones being 3000 lines, the smallest ones less than 20 lines).
I know Ruby (also very nice for small jobs) but HAC is much better (1) and certainly faster too (2)... We also coded a lot in Bash (there are sysadmin here too :)
(1) One of the great things about HAC is that all HAC code can be compiled by GNAT.
(2) HAC is 7 times faster than Bash
And, recently, HAC handles packages... This allows us to have modularity in the Ada way... HAC is a golden nugget ;)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-14 8:46 Ruby and Ada mockturtle
2022-05-14 12:53 ` Gautier write-only address
2022-05-14 13:40 ` Robin Vowels
2022-05-19 7:40 ` srOmatic [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox