From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/11/25
Message-ID: <57cvl3$uqc@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 200801133
references: <b127cc$f381c.17e@marius> <5743un$muj@news.nyu.edu>
 <57airn$7d0@olcs.olcs.com>
organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
Date: 1996-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <57airn$7d0@olcs.olcs.com> otto@olcs.com (Otto Lind) writes:
>has legally been assigned to the FSF.  I did not bother trying to
>resubmit the port to you, since others were working on improving it, and
>indicated that they would pick up maintenance (this was why I went
>through the re-assignment process).  It looks like this never happened.

Ah, yes, NOW I remember.  I think I recall who that was and why it
died, so perhaps we should persue installing your port.  Let's discuss
this by email.

>"somewhat tricky"?  I challenge you or anyone else to do a port of gcc to
>a processor with an extremely small register set without having to
>substantially modify the generic code in the reload modules.  If you know
>of any gcc port which supports a processor which has one accumulator and
>two (or one) index registers, I would be interested in seeing it.

The DSP1610 is fairly much like that.