Re: License for small Ada.* complements

[Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid>]

In article <98f62ae7-d908-4376-ab85-eb2f5787a4d5n@googlegroups.com>,
 Fabien Chouteau <fabien.chouteau@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:28:43 AM UTC+2, Thomas wrote:
> > i would like your opinion please, about which license i should use for a 
> 
> Licenses are nothing more than tools. It really depends on the goals you want 
> to achieve with this project.

ok.

> 
> When I publish a library it's usually because I want it to be useful for as 
> many people as possible.

too :-)

> So in my opinion, for libraries, stay away from any GPL variant as they are a 
> red-flags in many contexts and for many people.

i think the best would be a LGPL-like License.
is there some LGPL-like License which does not have "GPL red-flags"?

> 
> I think Apache 2.0 or MIT are best options.

i don't want BSD-like Licenses, i find them far too permissive.


are you French speaking ?
could you have a look at <62db6446$0$3011$426a74cc@news.free.fr> please? 
:-)

-- 
RAPID maintainer
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/