From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=3.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp1-2.free.fr!not-for-mail From: Thomas Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Mail-Copies-To: nobody Subject: TASHY / TASHY2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 21:29:49 +0100 Message-ID: <63bb27bd$0$3008$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jan 2023 21:29:49 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.175.52.121 X-Trace: 1673209789 news-3.free.fr 3008 91.175.52.121:1791 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64779 List-Id: hi :-) does someone know TASHY / TASHY2? https://github.com/thindil/tashy https://github.com/thindil/tashy2 is there any way that it would be better than TASH? i would feel "no", at least for the time it is no longer maintained. but maybe it was a good idea, and it would be better to maintain this rather than TASH "original"? I don't know, I don't know enough about all of them. -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/