From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: How to challenge a GCC patch?
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:29:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63ef1b5d-82eb-4446-b793-8465250f06bbn@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sj3jk8$79s$1@dont-email.me>
> We are talking about FSF-GNAT here. AFAIK, asis-gcc has not been pushed
> to FSF-GNAT.
What you call "asis-gcc" is a Pro version. We've never pushed any Pro version to FSF-GNAT, and there has never been any guarantee of correspondence between GNAT Pro and FSF-GNAT, so what you are demanding today for ASIS is unreasonable and unnecessary.
So assuming you are asking instead for some FSF version "close to asis-gcc", this version is available in the GCC 10.x branch, and similarly to asis-gcc which is on a long term, low changes branch at AdaCore, GCC 10.x is in the same state today. If you want an executable called "asis-gcc" then make a symbolic link from gcc (10.x) to asis-gcc and you have it.
> But this means that users of ASIS will be stuck to GCC 10.x, or will
> have to handle two versions of gcc at the same time, which is an endless
> source of burden.
The same is true for Pro users, no difference here: Pro users need to use GNAT x to compile, and ASIS-GCC y to generate trees. So what you are complaining about isn't different between Pro and community users, and making asis-gcc Pro available won't change that.
So to recap: you are asking for a Community version of "asis-gcc Pro": this version is available, it's GCC 10.x (10.3 being the latest available to date). And yes, it's a different version to generate trees than to compile Ada: the same is true for Pro users and they do not have specific issues with that.
Arno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 10:06 How to challenge a GCC patch? J-P. Rosen
2021-09-27 11:23 ` Stéphane Rivière
2021-09-27 14:18 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-28 7:38 ` Arnaud Charlet
2021-09-29 16:26 ` Stéphane Rivière
2021-09-29 19:04 ` Emmanuel Briot
2021-09-29 23:29 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 6:23 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 7:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 8:13 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 8:26 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 10:54 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 12:27 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 15:25 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-01 0:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-01 0:33 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-01 0:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-01 9:41 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-02 9:14 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-04 12:30 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-14 1:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-14 6:09 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 7:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 8:16 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 8:28 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 10:56 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 12:27 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-30 15:28 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 6:19 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-01 0:18 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-01 9:24 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-02 9:34 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-04 12:26 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-14 1:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-10-14 6:04 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 5:57 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 7:29 ` Arnaud Charlet [this message]
2021-09-30 7:52 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 8:21 ` Arnaud Charlet
2021-10-01 9:56 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-10-01 12:29 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-30 8:28 ` Fabien Chouteau
2021-09-27 12:48 ` Simon Wright
2021-09-27 14:20 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-28 6:55 ` Emmanuel Briot
2021-09-30 6:44 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-09-29 8:58 ` nobody in particular
2021-09-29 9:34 ` Emmanuel Briot
2021-09-29 10:03 ` Simon Wright
2021-09-29 11:03 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-09-29 11:07 ` Simon Wright
2021-09-29 18:58 ` Andreas ZEURCHER
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox