From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Received: by 2002:adf:e28a:0:b0:210:b31:722 with SMTP id v10-20020adfe28a000000b002100b310722mr10248361wri.65.1655487188208; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:33:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5b:148:0:b0:650:15bd:97ab with SMTP id c8-20020a5b0148000000b0065015bd97abmr11999662ybp.231.1655487187385; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.87.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.140.92.205; posting-account=84ieUgoAAAAnUS2e_T521zfeUcALYrrJ NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.140.92.205 References: <87wndzt8f1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <09683835-f090-47ce-8a39-467e5fb3167an@googlegroups.com> <87fskmty0c.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <871qw5ty1t.fsf@bsb.me.uk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <66a25bd1-e92c-477a-95da-5d365a6967a2n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: who needs types? Types makes code ugly. From: Wesley Pan Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 17:33:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63988 List-Id: On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 5:28:28 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote: > It is not likely that there will be an Ada 2022 Rationale, as no one has > stepped up to write it or pay John Barnes write it. The closest thing we > have is the Jeff Cousins overview, which I can't find an on-line reference > to (or my copy, for that matter). I'll check with Jeff and hopefully get > more information. > > Randy. How much would it likely cost to pay someone to generate the Ada2022 rationale? Maybe the community can join together to help fund the work? -Wesley