From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:899:: with SMTP id
 b25mr2851003qka.436.1573133263795;
        Thu, 07 Nov 2019 05:27:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:220f:: with SMTP id b15mr842213oic.44.1573133263414;
 Thu, 07 Nov 2019 05:27:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!j16no9036521qtl.0!news-out.google.com!p4ni513qtu.1!nntp.google.com!j16no9036515qtl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 05:27:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <04dd75bd-7c90-467f-b729-ca79e1377d0a@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.6.150.53;
 posting-account=CMtXAgoAAADrX4RLPW-ahkvKEhc1sSgg
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.6.150.53
References: <32accab7-f2cf-4eba-b4b6-642dd4ea81b3@googlegroups.com>
 <04dd75bd-7c90-467f-b729-ca79e1377d0a@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6d0419a6-a547-4939-93d9-52c26d8b108e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: how would gnoga.com beat www.tck.tk and postgresql on freebsd?
From: Azathoth Hastur <azathothhaster@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:27:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57507
Date: 2019-11-07T05:27:43-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-5, Shark8 wrote:
> On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 9:46:02 AM UTC-7, Azathoth Hastur wrote:
> > would it be easier?
> Possibly, because there's [optionally] non-database options... depending on your needs.
> The bindings to databases are exactly the same order of complexity in this regard.
> 
> > faster?
> The Ada.Containers can be used to keep things in memory, and if you're working on small datasets then you likely don't need a database at all. If you can do this, it is faster. / This was the method I used in my bulletin-board site. 
> 
> > fewer errors?
> Yes: Gnoga's DB bindings + migration protocol is *VERY* good for reducing errors. It would be even fewer if I can get NMESON (pure-Ada graph-based database) modernized and integrated into Gnoga.

what are ada containers?