From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b84:: with SMTP id k4mr29475859qkh.39.1593080072355; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a4a:6812:: with SMTP id p18mr26861865ooc.45.1593080071992; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 03:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 03:14:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a01:e35:2fe6:1fd0:b0ba:8876:74d1:8dac; posting-account=VpkXKAoAAACJdJbPSrB2RRuO-i3D4Q8l NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a01:e35:2fe6:1fd0:b0ba:8876:74d1:8dac References: <4d9fa282-830d-42f7-a3bf-ba127cb2ad06o@googlegroups.com> <8332f305-299f-45d7-9f9d-2cad924b24d8o@googlegroups.com> <9d941aca-2eb6-4f35-a346-c290c4666bdfo@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <76def2a5-667c-4009-b3b9-f0cf1c13a51bo@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada on Apple's new procesors From: charlet@adacore.com Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:14:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59221 List-Id: > > That's correct, there is no issue here. The GNAT LLVM compiler is a too= l and is licensed under GPLv3, which is just fine and the proper license fo= r a tool. The runtime which is linked with your executable comes from the g= cc.gnu.org repository and contains the GCC RunTime exception license. > >=20 >=20 > Can you confirm that using FSF GNAT with GNAT-LLVM (GPLv3) does or does > not enable the IR clause in the GPLv3? It does not and in any case, invoking this clause is a red herring since as= explained in the license, the concern and what's not allowed is using an i= ntermediate representation and feed it to a proprietary (non-GPL-compatible= ) software to e.g. optimize it or further process it. LLVM is a GPL-compatible Software, so this is irrelevant. Arno