From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:caa:b0:441:2e8f:f398 with SMTP id s10-20020a0562140caa00b004412e8ff398mr31007624qvs.61.1648645375795;
        Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2728:b0:680:d667:9e8b with SMTP id
 b40-20020a05620a272800b00680d6679e8bmr10821233qkp.275.1648645375344; Wed, 30
 Mar 2022 06:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t1imts$cac$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.63.246.187; posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.63.246.187
References: <svm0pl$1tdr$2@gioia.aioe.org> <52dec3b7-d1ab-4637-a96e-7bde3cab95f4n@googlegroups.com>
 <t1imts$cac$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <773fc0a2-e7d9-4967-a7e9-bd1d167c5539n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] UXStrings package available (UXS_20220226).
From: "Vincent D." <vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:02:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63679
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le jeudi 24 mars 2022 =C3=A0 22:13:40 UTC+1, Blady a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> Thus, for UXStrings, I choose Unicode_Character type as "generic"=20
> character (which renames Wide_Wide_Character), see for instance:=20
> https://github.com/Blady-Com/UXStrings/blob/master/src/uxstrings1.ads#L58=
=20
>=20
> May you be more specific?=20
> What advantages for the user would bring a UXCharacter type?=20

Hello Pascal,
We agree that a type for Unicode Code Point is mandatory. I find the name W=
ide_Wide_Character clumsy, and I would appreciate to have shorter names so =
as a personal taste I would simply prefer "Unicode" to "Unicode_Character".
Then I realize - and hence I contredict my own previous post - that the imp=
ortant concept for the user is the Grapheme cluster . So in fact a UXCharac=
ter should simply be a subtype of UXString storing one Grapheme Cluster.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,

Vincent