From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2c48:: with SMTP id s69-v6mr24525644ios.66.1525813231955; Tue, 08 May 2018 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5c8d:: with SMTP id a13-v6mr2894236oti.0.1525813231775; Tue, 08 May 2018 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v8-v6no650372itc.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni797itd.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no671845itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.167.3.186; posting-account=uulyKwoAAAA86DO0ODu--rZtbje8Sytn NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.167.3.186 References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <87k1su7nag.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po2la2qt.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in8buttb.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <87wowqpowu.fsf@nightsong.com> <16406268-83df-4564-8855-9bd0fe9caac0@googlegroups.com> <87o9i2pkcr.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in88m43h.fsf@nightsong.com> <87efiuope8.fsf@nightsong.com> <322f9b26-01de-4753-bb50-6ef2f3d993d8@googlegroups.com> <87a7th9pd1.fsf@nightsong.com> <87h8no1nli.fsf@nightsong.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <78ca61a2-5d11-46f4-9ce7-7fce500ca1dd@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? From: Egil H H Injection-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 21:00:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52127 Date: 2018-05-08T14:00:31-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 10:41:33 PM UTC+2, Niklas Holsti wrote: > On 18-05-04 01:27 , Randy Brukardt wrote: > > [snip] > > > There is no realistic chance that Ada will > > ever be changed enough to make it amenable to GC. > > Ouch and wow, when did that direction change? > > As I remember it, for a long time the mantra was that Ada (83, 95, ...) > was compatible with GC, but vendors did not implement GC because there > was no immediate demand from the current users (chicken and egg situation). > Indeed, RM 4.8(15/3): "27 {AI05-0229-1} Implementations are permitted, but not required, to provide garbage collection." http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/aarm12_w_tc1/html/AA-4-8.html http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai05s/ai05-0229-1.txt?rev=1.28 -- ~egilhh