From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ef12:: with SMTP id
 k18-v6mr2929631ioh.31.1530562630223;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c6ca:: with SMTP id
 w193-v6mr2999502oif.1.1530562629980;
 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no3329293itj.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni2806iti.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no3329290itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <phe03h$kh5$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=47.185.195.62;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.195.62
References: <856189aa-fa00-4960-929e-174f352310ad@googlegroups.com>
 <phe03h$kh5$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <79fe190a-62d7-4794-8631-5cc685f8382b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Teaching C/C++ from Ada perspective?
From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:17:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53520
Date: 2018-07-02T13:17:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 2:57:38 PM UTC-5, G.B. wrote:
> On 30.06.18 20:04, kouaoua16@gmail.com wrote:
> > but in C and C++ to fist year students
>=20
> Whichever way you decide to go, perpetuating the misconception
> of: C and C++ being closely related languages is going to add
> effects to programs written in C as well as to programs written
> in C++, in that they'll not be written in idiomatic C or idiomatic
> C++. Outside of sales talk---if teaching programming does establish
> non-commercial foundations for thinking---the phrase "C/C++", i.e.,
> "C Slash C Plus Plus" should raise the alarm.
>=20
> And 'A' is not 65!

Another most-excellent reply by G.B. in recent days.  I agree with this 100=
%.

Perhaps if there is an olive branch of shared communique between Maciej Sob=
czak's statements and mine in prior replies, it is what G.B. implies above:=
  teach as little C in C++ as possible=E2=80=94emphasize the nonC portions =
of C++.  Maciej and I differ seemingly only on the path to travel to arrive=
 at that general destination.