From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this definition legal? Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:42:52 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> References: Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1095583964 07 30205 62WgX3qJhd233F9 040919 08:52:44 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: VI5XJaZbgeqlhi1Ww-BPDWcBrsqGBfxuIcIU8JLZTL63NKebT+TxcR User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3839 Date: 2004-09-19T10:42:52+02:00 List-Id: Bj�rn Persson wrote: > My first question is: Is this definition of Character_Encoding legal and "Legal" questions should be send to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. They are the guys who can not only "advice" but also "decide" on such issues. Of course you should join the list (listserv@ada-auth.org) otherwise you never see the answer. With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com