From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:e48d:: with SMTP id o135-v6mr5281982ith.48.1525034670869; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:44:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:620d:: with SMTP id g13-v6mr812322otj.3.1525034670573; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!f63-v6no1777750itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni2927itb.0!nntp.google.com!k65-v6no1775906ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:44:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <876049vngk.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.223.129; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.223.129 References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <87k1su7nag.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po2la2qt.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in8buttb.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <87wowqpowu.fsf@nightsong.com> <87efiyuh10.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <87vacanebz.fsf@nightsong.com> <87a7tlvppi.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <87k1sponey.fsf@nightsong.com> <876049vngk.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <812c2d63-e4c1-4897-a44a-060dd9600ef9@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:44:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51808 Date: 2018-04-29T13:44:30-07:00 List-Id: > Type inference, and languages built around the idea that types can specify complex properties of the program. Hmm, can't you do most of that with contracts like aspects Dynamic_Predicate and Type_Invariant ? What else would you like to have ?