From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cccf6ef6149fdaa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Operators -> unit analysis Date: 2000/01/06 Message-ID: <850tl9$thu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 568781956 References: <38620350.48F8FC08@gecm.com> <83u8l0$5i5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84rd2f$snm$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <84thof$9r3$1@nntp4.atl.mindspring.net> <387383D0.4EA02E95@earthlink.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 06 02:12:03 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-01-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <387383D0.4EA02E95@earthlink.net>, Charles Hixson wrote: > Terry Sikes wrote: > > > ... > > One thing I'd like to see in both languages is the ability to use a > > set of non-reserved Unicode symbols for operator overloading, to > > disambiguate with the normal operator symbols. > > > > Terry > > -- > > tsikes@netcom.com > > I don't insist on unicode, but I would also like more operators that could > be overloaded. This was an issue discussed at length during the design, and the great majority felt it was an unnecessary complexification to add such operators. Even a limited proposal to add a single operator to be used for "almost implicit" conversions failed. I don't see what has changed to make it worth rearguing the point. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.