From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!ll-xn!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!spp1.UUCP!alden%jade From: alden%jade@spp1.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lang.ada Subject: Re: USE clauses Message-ID: <8608061657.AA01773@jade.SPP.TRW> Date: Wed, 6-Aug-86 21:09:20 EDT Article-I.D.: jade.8608061657.AA01773 Posted: Wed Aug 6 21:09:20 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Aug-86 02:36:29 EDT References: <860806020842.796972@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet List-Id: David, You can access operators with prefix notation and dot (.) notation with the package name. my_var := my_package."+"(op1,op2); Also, the arguement for using use based on long names is still weak. If you have a problem with long package names then use RENAMES, again as local to the block affected as possible. Renames can be used to abrivate the package name or to abreviate the package and operation combination. The arguement for tools to analyze code is a good one. To date, the only good tool to do this kind of analysis is on the Rational R1000 computer. Have you got $750,000.00 to give me so that I can use the tool? ... Tony Alden TRW