From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ed6:: with SMTP id h205mr986204qke.384.1592315520720; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7852:: with SMTP id c18mr2424542otm.82.1592315520479; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder5.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <rcafp9$162q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.34.132.200; posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.34.132.200
References: <rcaajp$g3k$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rcaaug$g3k$2@gioia.aioe.org> <rcabm8$a70$1@dont-email.me> <rcaeef$hqo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rcaets$our$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rcafid$4lu$1@dont-email.me> <rcafp9$162q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <861c5ff2-e72a-486f-a87b-2711834641feo@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:52:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59091
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 3:00:28 PM UTC+2, Luke A. Guest wrote:
> On 16/06/2020 13:56, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> > Le 16/06/2020 =C3=A0 14:45, Luke A. Guest a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> >>> Except, you can't use that pragma, because it wants all other's to be
> >>> preelaborated, but they're not.
> >>>
> >> And this is one of the things that really annoys me about Ada.
> >>
> > But how could it be otherwise? If you depend on a non-preelaborable
> > unit, then you depend on something which is not computable at compile
> > time...
>=20
> Which misses the point entirely of my original issue, and complete
> hatred of this part of Ada. Literally, if something can be compiled to
> be in the data section, it should be.

I don't know why you insist on eliminating elaboration code, but try to see=
 if this can help you:

https://docs.adacore.com/gnathie_ug-docs/html/gnathie_ug/gnathie_ug/using_g=
nat_pro_features_relevant_to_high_integrity.html#avoiding-elaboration-code

Regards,
Mark L