From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!pBWEO6hi52oGFheO/GY5ag.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Suggestion about best practice with .gpr files
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 10:46:37 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <86a6oci076.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
References: <f6b41bac-39d2-441d-a89d-3485bf3fa99bn@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pBWEO6hi52oGFheO/GY5ag.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (windows-nt)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Za9mT77isszV5mOW66OkJOJeA4g=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62050
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

mockturtle <framefritti@gmail.com> writes:

> foolib/
> ...|
> ...+-- foolib.gpr
> ...+-- src/
> ...+-- obj/
> ...+-- test/
> ..........|
> ..........+--foolib_test.gpr
> ..........+--obj/
> ..........+--src/
> ................|
> ...............+-- foo_test_1.adb
> ...............+-- foo_test_2.adb
> ...............+-- foo_test_3.adb
>
> I hope you got the idea. 

I do something similar; I put both foolib_test.gpr and foolib.gpr in a
build directory with a Makefile, and they share an obj directory.

> Do you have any suggestion about a different organization? Do there
> exist some kind of "best practice" for this?

Certainly hiding the test code from the client is essential; other than
that I don't think it matters much.

-- 
-- Stephe