From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.pBWEO6hi52oGFheO/GY5ag.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ALI Files Cross-References Inconsistency? Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:33:39 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <86a6xd5vwc.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <1ab5413e-ac60-4fb7-b3bd-930de3f0fe0do@googlegroups.com> <86imc16dd7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: pBWEO6hi52oGFheO/GY5ag.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BdhugFKJ6GQdMeYPAF/Mc/UkNvc= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:60277 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > On 25/09/2020 18:16, Stephen Leake wrote: >> Leandro Ribeiro writes: >> >>> I am currently analyzing .ali files. >> Be aware that AdaCore is moving away from ali files for cross >> referencing; that functionality is now provided by libadalang. > > Can you elaborate? GNATStudio uses libadalang when navigating between files; it does not use the .ali files. > Presently we keep ALI files as build artifacts. Object files are not > enough in order to avoid recompilation. Ok, so .ali files will not go away entirely. But they may lose all their cross-reference info. -- -- Stephe