Re: License for small Ada.* complements

[Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>]

Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid> writes:

> In article <86mtcyu1c6.fsf@stephe-leake.org>,
>  Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
>
>> Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid> writes:
>> 
>> > In article <86sfmsi7ir.fsf@stephe-leake.org>,
>> >  Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > i would like your opinion please, about which license i should use for a 
>> >> > part of my libraries.
>> >> 
>> >> Always use the GPL unless you have a specific reason not to; ie, a
>> >> customer asks/pays for a different license.
>> >
>> > do you use GPL rather than LGPL on libraries ??
>> 
>> Yes; GPL 3 has a better way of handling libraries.
>
> could you precise me please?
>
> does it allow to use it in any proprietary program, as required for this 
> kind of generic libraries?

You did not mention this requirement before.

> do you use "pragma License Modified_GPL" or "pragma License GPL" on 
> libraries?

Modified_GPL allows use in proprietary programs; GPL does not.

-- 
-- Stephe