From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 23:34:55 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87a7tay7sg.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <87in8buttb.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <87wowqpowu.fsf@nightsong.com> <16406268-83df-4564-8855-9bd0fe9caac0@googlegroups.com> <87o9i2pkcr.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in88m43h.fsf@nightsong.com> <87efiuope8.fsf@nightsong.com> <322f9b26-01de-4753-bb50-6ef2f3d993d8@googlegroups.com> <87a7th9pd1.fsf@nightsong.com> <87h8no1nli.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po2cyty7.fsf@nightsong.com> <87bmdwhwob.fsf@nightsong.com> <6746d7d1-406e-4891-8293-9424aed76215@googlegroups.com> <877eoezy6e.fsf@nightsong.com> <87y3gun1ha.fsf@nightsong.com> <360830912.547453809.794570.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52b5ce8581a197e35f17678a348070d7"; logging-data="9450"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rX27KB8bz+5pz70HAiBKm" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7vvEDLcuWGQ1HYFTbIEMwM1l+dk= sha1:y1YLE82UJx+HPG0H81yyDDudDZ8= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52092 Date: 2018-05-07T23:34:55-07:00 List-Id: Luke A. Guest writes: > You don’t have to use gprbuild, you can everything from a makefile if you > want to just using gnatmake and/or gcc. Thanks. The zip-ada package came with some build scripts for Windows plus a prj file, so on Linux I used gprbuild which mostly worked. I didn't realize gcc+makefiles was an alternative. I'd have to write a makefile for the purpose, but it may be worth the effort of improving the Linux packaging for this program.