From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!tiscali!transit1.news.tiscali.nl!dreader2.news.tiscali.nl!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this definition legal? References: <87mzznjg5z.fsf@insalien.org> From: Ludovic Brenta Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:21:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87brg2j9hi.fsf@insalien.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yC/scPz8J/7h+Fq5UZ4g5JdEkK0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Tiscali bv NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2004 22:23:48 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.134.238.231 X-Trace: 1095625428 dreader2.news.tiscali.nl 62365 83.134.238.231:35028 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tiscali.nl Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3852 Date: 2004-09-19T22:23:48+02:00 List-Id: Björn Persson writes: > Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> Whether or not your code is legal, a bug box is a bug. I would be >> interested in a short test case for each of your issues (one for the >> bug box upon declaring a Character_Encoding without an initialiser; > > That one is easy: [elided] It compiles fine with gnat_3.15p-12 on Debian, but gives the bug box with 3.4.2-2. I added comments to that effect in Bugzilla, and also attached your shorter test case. -- Ludovic Brenta.