From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get Ada to =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9Ccross?= the =?utf-8?Q?ch?=
 =?utf-8?Q?asm=E2=80=9D=3F?=
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 23:32:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87efimy7x5.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com>
	<878t9nemrl.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<d64089d4-af9d-43d9-b72b-a73d3fff1f00@googlegroups.com>
	<bf8f8498-f017-47dd-bf1f-188c7ceb5b28@googlegroups.com>
	<ed222259-b860-41a1-82ad-62f93d941faf@googlegroups.com>
	<fl3pbpF73fsU1@mid.individual.net>
	<r0bqedllrrbsihtoplg5qccap3ljc4rikl@4ax.com>
	<lya7tezfty.fsf@pushface.org> <87h8nl50rw.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<fl6i3lFprddU1@mid.individual.net> <87d0y97lda.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<87o9hsu3er.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="52b5ce8581a197e35f17678a348070d7";
	logging-data="9450"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182JV+l6WkSWjzUTRYak56z"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OSPwZQrxPJymLeqkVk/a8WfMMoQ=
	sha1:x9vHORGdLvLGO1/oF3vjUnnksBs=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52091
Date: 2018-05-07T23:32:06-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> writes:
>> Then the function writes the result into the primary stack and the
>> caller can still use it after the function returns.
>
> How would you do it with this example? ...
>    procedure Random_String is  ...

I couldn't tell quite what that example was doing, but C++ std::strings
are allocated on the heap, so it looks to me like the return value is a
single pointer.  Std::vector should be similar while std:array is just
for fixed size arrays.  I think C++ may be more willing in general than
Ada to heap-allocate data, which is freed when it goes out of scope.