From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm??
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 10:10:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87fu2w3iml.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com>
	<pcmjao$1soj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fl8lgcF9dqgU1@mid.individual.net>
	<pcnem2$19mn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fl938cFchk8U1@mid.individual.net>
	<pcnqgm$1tb4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87k1sg2qux.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<pcov1b$1cvt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87h8njmk4r.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<pcq81a$1n85$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87po27fbv9.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<flemg6FkatpU1@mid.individual.net> <87in7x62vw.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<flh2g3F5sg3U1@mid.individual.net> <878t8szdtk.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<fljpeuFogvdU1@mid.individual.net> <87tvrdhl5v.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<flnqeuFkst1U1@mid.individual.net> <pd6h9u$tvp$1@dont-email.me>
	<flogsmFpr2tU1@mid.individual.net> <pd73hj$g0o$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9dec120c4fa556eefd384bbc0bb3fc36";
	logging-data="6100"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18T6fWphu0MI1xnZD6XTTxz"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uj1D52WvY3CXSh/FmHZxVFYj5Z8=
	sha1:eHRlHFa58ZiLkX6LOMjbZNfHvbE=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52321
Date: 2018-05-12T10:10:10-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:
> "... the Agile catechism: we're Agile, we don't need to stop and
> think, we just go ahead and code!"

I think in the high-assurance community they use the term "rapid
prototyping" for this style of development, and they see it as a good
thing, as long as you don't claim that the thing produced that way is
the final product.  This is about a US Navy project where they compared
a bunch of different rapid prototyping approaches.

http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/HaskellVsAda-NSWC.pdf