From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-28 18:58:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Subtle Bugs, kudos Ada (was How Ada ...Red Code ...)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:14:33 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87heurhat2.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <bebbba07.0107292308.d1192fc@posting.google.com>
 <yecofq03kih.fsf@king.cts.com> <3B672322.B5EA1B66@home.com>
 <ppsemtojqkqsqpfvj1th3mae8b4vu1tg89@4ax.com>
 <4a885870.0108112341.7ce02ac0@posting.google.com>
 <3B834E5D.B0D26AB1@adaworks.com> <9lvsic$bet9s$1@ID-9852.news.dfncis.de>
 <9m0193$grs$1@bird.wu-wien.ac.at> <3B83F042.4CFB073D@home.com>
 <nHUg7.93012$B37.2083519@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com>
 <3B8462C8.5596C089@yahoo.com> <87n14nmbf8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <3B89A809.46083436@yahoo.com> <871ylxpxu6.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <3B8AA131.3FCC0E9A@yahoo.com> <87g0ad44ab.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <3B8B1130.97FFDD66@yahoo.com>
 <CqFi7.113012$B37.2504665@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com>
 <3B8BD171.32C155D2@yahoo.com>
 <_SRi7.115023$B37.2552767@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com>
 <3B8BED46.3DEE945B@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12540 comp.lang.c:77323
 comp.lang.c++:86338
Date: 2001-08-29T04:14:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Joe Maun <reply_to@yahoo.com> writes:

> The *value* is defined arithmetically, while the bit positions are
> defined in terms of bit-shifts.

But where?  I haven't seen any definition of the term 'bit-shift'.  It
seems that you consider the introductory explanation of the relevant
parapgraph a definition, but most people do not seem to agree.

Sometimes I wish there was another version of the C standard which
contained the strictly normative parts. ;-)