From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Java and Python have just discovered "record" type finally after 40 years. Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 01:24:32 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87ilcreren.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <878rdrrlly.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87353ys8is.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3a04fef3e972cacf64a3155a19102bb1"; logging-data="3820705"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xXhmC6pByzGQ0f6RtiFGfQnwWUk64aCw=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kNLKN4I694A9B05SxU3YACdsCXM= sha1:mzHb4P99ioorduHmcTA0CxqJK9E= X-BSB-Auth: 1.76709636021e2c0d7a75.20230517012432BST.87ilcreren.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65245 List-Id: "Jeffrey R.Carter" writes: > On 2023-05-15 03:11, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> Do you still have it? Does is discuss association lists? I'd call them >> a normal part of LISP and it would be odd to force the associations to >> be lists rather than pairs. Does Siklóssy imply that an ASSOC list is a >> list of lists of length 2, or does he not discuss them until the very >> end? > > The Function ASSOC is discussed in Chapter 9 as an auxiliary function used > by EVAL (Chapter 9 discusses the working of EVAL). It says > > ASSOC finds the value of a variable in the ALIST. The ALIST is a list of > sublists of two SEXes each of the form (variable > value-of-the-variable). Thanks. Is this a dialect made up for pedagogic purposes? I don't know of any practical LISP that went down this route. > Seems rather OT for c.l.a. Yes, it is. Happy to stop. I was just curious about where your use of terms originated and that now explained. -- Ben.