From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada versus Pascal
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:29:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87ilxod1nd.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <sktb3o$dn1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
	<6pq5ngtioomfo2depk1ickvbdmleuqq16i@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dfefd91eefa44a4427e4ba3ae4b7dfc5";
	logging-data="16385"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PPepvrk1e8vPVsXDcIFkh"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0rw+FJse/68tD+vhWcvmQzozeaM=
	sha1:U9Dm97Nv+lDa8GTHGLgFE4P5vnc=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63058
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> 	Also, Pascal of the era typically did not support separate
> compilation and/or include files -- programs were all single
> monolithic files, any change required recompiling the entire program.

I thought Ada was originally like that too.  The program could be split
into multiple files, but they were expected to all be compiled together.