From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this definition legal? Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:12:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87k6uo27bm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> <2617548.neE1jZqPik@linux1.krischik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1095700334 22186 212.9.189.171 (20 Sep 2004 17:12:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:rNI/SuoUd0t2HIt+/B6rBP1m7r0= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3871 Date: 2004-09-20T19:12:13+02:00 List-Id: * Martin Krischik: > Currently it is mostly a "Ada.Containers" discussion list. But is is a list > for both changes and clarifications. It's not clear if a clarification of the standard is needed here. Surely ada-comment is not the list to ask random questions about the standard!