From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SystemD controversy Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:01:42 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Message-ID: <87le6m552h.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <3ca74be3-9450-797a-4754-7615f12888ec@Insomnia247.NL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3a33dee2b2d0e1e9aaa54021fdfdfa61"; logging-data="1163428"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eSLH1Zggh7mjGtDtD8Y8o" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xlwNm2TABLB1qAKRDCdq8cERDHE= sha1:3JRVwf4I1jj6d59zVqhesk8DZWM= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66135 List-Id: Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester writes: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, MAGardner2010 wrote: > "I'm pretty sure that the presence or absence of SystemD doesn't, [. . .] > influence how compilers work." > > Hello, > > I agree. > > "[. . .] it shouldn't matter if one is programming on/for Debian, > Devuan, Arch, Fedora, Red Hat, or possibly even one of the BSDs." > > GNU/Linux users debate about SystemD allegedly being buggy and > insecure. Contributors to GNU/Linux distributions boast that such > distributions do not use SystemD because of these reasons. A new > GNU/Linux distribution was created specifically to avoid SystemD. I do > not want to use (Ada-compiler) software on a buggy or insecure > operating system. Do you? All operating systems are buggy and insecure. Some are less so than others. I have no particular opinion on whether systemd makes a system more or less secure. (The system I'm typing this on happens to use systemd, a fact that I routinely ignore.) If you prefer to avoid systemd, that's fine, but I don't see the relevance to Ada. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */