From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get Ada to "cross the chasm"? Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 14:13:30 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87lgcvf9tx.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <94bd81e5-2ef5-41a2-973a-72f2ba4cecd1@googlegroups.com> <721a01f5-569a-4cec-b0e9-62d19e1443fb@googlegroups.com> <431526826.547202380.696445.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8e10b317856a6344fb35132252789110"; logging-data="24459"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kcud0ghlum1WAracnI7Ww" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OTU1k7L6cVryfwnLPD1LzzL8Xq4= sha1:WX8PqshNs+WfAgCL0aQwoNhXNx4= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52074 Date: 2018-05-07T14:13:30-07:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > I'm trying to look for a radical simplification... Otherwise, we'll > have no choice but to delay Ada 2020 or defer it. If you mean "defer it" means ship Ada 2020 on schedule but postpone this particular feature til post-Ada-2020, that might be reasonable, since it's important to get it right in the long run. Is it possible to do what C++ does and release an experimental feature that might be changed incompatibly in a future version?