From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Not good for Ada endorsement Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 01:10:34 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87mtqvucud.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <5a1cegtfm5ibqej3ldebpc4g99ujniqt9u@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f71bfd2924a96713e31cdce7f664c7c7"; logging-data="10553"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ec1ZVHHkbF1dal34aMv3J" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IhvW4giQiKvrvUYrqwqC6YH9j30= sha1:aLxQeElF3VKcyJgfkfYXQ5lHqQQ= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62362 List-Id: "Luke A. Guest" writes: > It's as straight a conversion from the C++ to Ada. I intend to keep > optimising it. I'd be interested in seeing a straight conversion of Pascal to Ada, if the existing Ada code differs significantly from the existing Pascal code in a way that affects the speed and isn't a straightforward conversion.