From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gtk in ada using radiobuttons Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:17:05 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87o7uapumm.fsf@samuel> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ee0e2c84afcad055c5f67be1d556b344"; logging-data="3610099"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qkmSCeluxXadZVP+sWSP6" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7sOAsbVl+Xa89RYhj5mRYHGnN/Y= sha1:Y9L8b2olWzQqBm1GDLFOfz6QAUs= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64516 List-Id: ldries46 writes: > Op 16-10-2022 om 22:12 schreef Jeffrey R.Carter: >> On 2022-10-16 18:43, ldries46 wrote: >>> >>> But the dialog looks good with the exception that both buttons are >>> activated and cannot be deactivated. I still do want the choice >>> between the two I cannot find that in the When running in debugging >>> mode I can see that the group still is null >> >> A set of 2 radio buttons is usually equivalent to a check box, which >> is visually simpler as well. >> > Building a program is sometimes a step by step process. It may be > possible that I need a third or even a fourth possibility in the > choice, so in my opinion it is good to anticipate That's what I assumed. Have you considered a Gtk_Combo_Box as an alternative? -- Ludovic Brenta. The attackers re-invent our correlations. As a result, co-innovations swiftly revolutionise our projections.