From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Latest suggestion for 202x Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:12:17 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87pnncnnke.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <728c4668-8fa0-4a57-a502-2bf476fc3940@googlegroups.com> <67a4abcc-6a33-40af-a3c4-6855b3bf8226@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0dbf938e4e359d630498ea229b57ac43"; logging-data="1461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3JoINg2sy33e3nExkFhFy" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CKBXLeDwEmdyZ5zjVjkH0CAKG8U= sha1:nFEb8gP3DXttPPntGJF3Si0VmHg= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56666 Date: 2019-06-17T10:12:17-07:00 List-Id: John Perry writes: > One exception to this rule is Eiffel, which uses the @ operator. I > decided to see if I could find a summary, and [1] has it. The only > really strange one IMHO is Haskell, which uses !. Haskell doesn't have syntax for arrays, and its arrays are a library package, not part of the language. Haskell has user-defined operators and the array library defines ! as a subscript operator.