From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Adacore Blog - Going Beyond Ada 2022
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:33:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87v96n2e2h.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <a2188489-c571-40ac-9a07-61417b46d8f1n@googlegroups.com>
	<s9piig$1bn$1@dont-email.me>
	<b05ea19f-aa65-4f94-97a5-0356e4e2a693n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8a612fa17c2e7dd40cbaf9074acabd0e";
	logging-data="18310"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S8ehaK2bplyL9RevOmYo0"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1fpZBwICH/V79s457KtAQyLKTXk=
	sha1:7h1eRHLWNiiTE8i6QVUPp1sTN1A=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62153
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de> writes:
> Sounds like creating dialects. RFCs implemented in GNAT, but not
> submitted to ARG. What a mess!

It sounded like the RFCs platform is intended to experimentally test
proposed new features, which sounds better than standardizing them
without testing them first.  And hasn't GNAT always has had extensions
beyond the ARM?  Is this anything new?