From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bob Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Placement of pragmas in the grammar (language laywers required) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:19:47 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87zixixj24.fsf@theworld.com> References: <874mfqz0qr.fsf@theworld.com> <02d6416b-57a8-4d99-bfb3-3baa5f30531c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f894d1c4a3c7179f566ec651474040aa"; logging-data="17182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189970ht7kZ0H8giPzm1cc7" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zdi7FauL0Zp+iSQ0aO5VKKkJwiA= sha1:dUAk//68B7m0qWCyvAUJfm2Ho7w= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28759 Date: 2015-12-10T13:19:47-05:00 List-Id: Lucretia writes: > I would assume the check to make sure pragma is "not in place of" something > should be part of the semantic steps? That's probably easiest. - Bob