From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d601:: with SMTP id
 r1mr102099379qkk.231.1560972549989;
        Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5ac6:: with SMTP id o189mr3310470oib.37.1560972549708;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!m24no3866786qtm.0!news-out.google.com!4ni170qtw.1!nntp.google.com!m24no3866779qtm.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e0cbc4b4-48f3-4776-8543-3c32efcaadd0@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <728c4668-8fa0-4a57-a502-2bf476fc3940@googlegroups.com>
 <faec9e41-f34a-4b59-9ab4-0724b92ac4e7@googlegroups.com>
 <800240ae-4c5f-424e-869f-2791e07a50d2@googlegroups.com>
 <6be082a3-b8aa-4e7d-825c-bd998894f077@googlegroups.com>
 <e0cbc4b4-48f3-4776-8543-3c32efcaadd0@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8828d6c2-8565-4acf-a56a-b921092c40c4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Latest suggestion for 202x
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:29:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56687
Date: 2019-06-19T12:29:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, 19 June 2019 15:34:16 UTC+1, Optikos  wrote:
> 1) Fork FSF GNAT.

There's pain here in that it's based on GCC which isn't pleasant or easy.
 
maintenance and ARG's standardization).  In prior posts on c.l.a in prior months, you have proposed language features that alter Ada's fundamental syntax (e.g., {} braces instead of begin-end-esque blocks).  As Randy has correctly 

Nope never wanted braces, other people have though.