From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:746:: with SMTP id k6mr16019243qth.303.1614742309723;
        Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:31:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6e57:: with SMTP id j84mr36495225ybc.277.1614742309527;
 Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:31:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3808e6ec-1a49-4514-84e7-f444d94cdb2cn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:3c3:401:f550:a005:9351:ec60:a76e;
 posting-account=JSxOkAoAAADa00TJoz2WZ_46XrZCdXeS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:3c3:401:f550:a005:9351:ec60:a76e
References: <602e608e$0$27680$e4fe514c@news.kpn.nl> <60379b69$0$20345$e4fe514c@news.kpn.nl>
 <s1a9jm$1c9e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <86zgzn4xcs.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <5b0c7577-7dcc-468b-a24b-7447a8e796b7n@googlegroups.com> <3808e6ec-1a49-4514-84e7-f444d94cdb2cn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8918a94d-6b09-4092-95e6-c5f5a40e493dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Alternative for Gnat Studio
From: John Perry <john.perry@usm.edu>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 03:31:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61462
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 2:08:25 AM UTC-6, briot.e...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Honest question: do you have advice for debugging exceptions in GDB?***
> Do you know about the "catch exception" command ? gdb will automatically break when an exception is raised. There could be a lot of these, so you can also try the variant "catch exception unhandled". 

Nope, that's new to me. I'll try it next time, thanks.

john perry