From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e08:: with SMTP id h8mr8758937qtx.655.1644828474319; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:47:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:ae8c:: with SMTP id b12mr11365905ybj.305.1644828474067; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:47:54 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:47:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <32a576a3-933e-4db8-a26d-f506c48f9056n@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.49.146.113; posting-account=8NChnQgAAABYduHZ3wYPl1dIbmQlRV05 NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.49.146.113 References: <1e07b1bf-d60c-41e4-92f1-0f652b48f8d3n@googlegroups.com> <32a576a3-933e-4db8-a26d-f506c48f9056n@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8ab9abf5-c0f0-4813-8efc-57878efda520n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: GtkAda for GTk4? From: Andreas Almroth Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:47:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63512 List-Id: On Monday, 14 February 2022 at 08:46:03 UTC+1, briot.e...@gmail.com wrote: > > GtkAda bindings are generated by a tool designed by AdaCore. This tool > > might require massive changes when migrating to GTK 4. > I wrote that python script years ago, when the XML files that describe the gtk+ API were actually pretty bad type-wise. > The script is full of special cases, and very ugly. I don't think anyone should use it as a basis for binding to gtk 4, it > would likely be much better to restart from scratch. I believe the XML files have improved significantly since then, and > are used by more languages bindings, too, so that could likely be simplified. > > Emmanuel Thanks Emmanuel for your input. Seems it indeed would be a larger effort, and as Dimitry states, perhaps one should wait for next major release. It will take some time in any event to create the interface binding. /A