From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1456:: with SMTP id i22mr26244504qkl.423.1593024931582; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:c143:: with SMTP id r64mr20875757oif.7.1593024931443; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5eda7cff-7fb6-4519-995c-269e62ecbacfo@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.35; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.35 References: <4d9fa282-830d-42f7-a3bf-ba127cb2ad06o@googlegroups.com> <8332f305-299f-45d7-9f9d-2cad924b24d8o@googlegroups.com> <9d941aca-2eb6-4f35-a346-c290c4666bdfo@googlegroups.com> <14ffa125-e27d-4d34-8c12-27afb2ea0b13o@googlegroups.com> <5eda7cff-7fb6-4519-995c-269e62ecbacfo@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8ba473c8-edee-4b35-af90-78f38c6027e0o@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada on Apple's new procesors From: Optikos Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:55:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59206 List-Id: On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 1:18:58 PM UTC-5, Stephen Leake wrote: > On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 10:59:24 AM UTC-7, Luke A. Guest wrote: > > On 24/06/2020 17:35, Simon Wright wrote: > >=20 > > > As a side note, the README.md in gnat-llvm says "This is a > > > work-in-progress research project that=E2=80=99s not meant for and sh= ouldn=E2=80=99t be > > > used for industrial purposes. It=E2=80=99s meant to show the feasibil= ity of > > > generating LLVM bitcode for Ada and to open the LLVM ecosystem to Ada= , > > > including tools such as KLEE." > > >=20 > >=20 > > Then for Apple stuff, we're all screwed :D >=20 > Until someone pays AdaCore to fully support LLVM. This stuff doesn't happ= en for free! But if someone pays AdaCore to fully support LLVM, why would AdaCore merge = LLVM stuff into FSF? Although RMS is less connected nowadays due to a poli= tical-correctness gaffe or two, a shotgun marriage of FSF and LLVM through = the Ada backdoor would most certainly ruffle a few feathers at FSF, I would= think.