From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a30f:: with SMTP id m15mr28978247qke.433.1617088355330;
        Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1883:: with SMTP id 125mr41631417yby.465.1617088354958;
 Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!50.7.236.18.MISMATCH!fdc3.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer04.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3b3ff9aa-26b9-4da7-82de-a5f6c1980335n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.88.29.208; posting-account=6yLzewoAAABoisbSsCJH1SPMc9UrfXBH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.88.29.208
References: <07a56dcc-9e17-49b2-a980-3a5a2d265cedn@googlegroups.com>
 <s3akbl$dg3$1@dont-email.me> <23dcce3e-0db1-4417-a5d1-a05f03f74464n@googlegroups.com>
 <s3arav$3mf$1@dont-email.me> <302c2e86-2379-46e0-b1f7-d69e7e14f9cfn@googlegroups.com>
 <s3ccgm$4j7$1@dont-email.me> <b962cd83-c15a-4285-9754-48008e685c49n@googlegroups.com>
 <s3dtgn$r48$1@dont-email.me> <86h7kyapsn.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <3b3ff9aa-26b9-4da7-82de-a5f6c1980335n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8f009bf0-d5a3-42b8-9bd9-12bce24f1093n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Performance of records with variant parts
From: Emmanuel Briot <briot.emmanuel@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:12:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2108
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61676
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> So, thank you very much for remembering this and getting back to me! But =
by now I've concluded that gprof misled me. Wouldn't be the first time. The=
 difference in performance is real, but must be caused elsewhere. I don't e=
ven feel confidence submitting an enhancement request to AdaCore because by=
 now I have no idea what the problem is.=20

Since you are on linux, you might want to look at `perf` for performance an=
alysis:

    perf record --call-graph=3Dfp your_program
    perf report -g