From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:174b:b0:343:1fc:14d8 with SMTP id l11-20020a05622a174b00b0034301fc14d8mr19735283qtk.579.1662909291332;
        Sun, 11 Sep 2022 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4450:b0:6bb:c19a:c022 with SMTP id
 w16-20020a05620a445000b006bbc19ac022mr15978662qkp.240.1662909291127; Sun, 11
 Sep 2022 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 08:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ly1qsi9vrv.fsf@pushface.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:e7:ff00:eaa4:a5b9:ca5e:71e9:81ca;
 posting-account=Md_OIgoAAAAkZyQ6nYoc3WBIThMpPfV7
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:e7:ff00:eaa4:a5b9:ca5e:71e9:81ca
References: <4eecf346-667a-4dee-80b2-c3597b0f6fa7n@googlegroups.com> <ly1qsi9vrv.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9263a570-325f-4f9c-a06a-7b4dc54712fcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this an error in compiler
From: Oliver Kellogg <olivermkellogg@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 15:14:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1661
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64320
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 10:10:19 AM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
> reinert <rei...@gmail.com> writes: 
> > [...]
> I have to say these conditional constructs strike me as regrettable 
> Perl-isms, and reduce clarity: 
> 
> return foo when blah; 
> raise baz when quux;

+1 on that.
On the other hand,

  blah and return foo;
  quux and raise baz;

would make more sense to me.
Not that I am proposing it, IMO Ada already has way too many extensions.