From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.236.14.99 with SMTP id c63mr249423yhc.40.1405637566343;
        Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.132.42 with SMTP id or10mr566584igb.10.1405637566044;
 Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!j15no1286902qaq.0!news-out.google.com!gf2ni867igb.0!nntp.google.com!h18no3312358igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wqbb1uby.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
References: <lq9da9$oav$3@dont-email.me>
 <87wqbb1uby.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <94de26e6-28f6-4162-af6a-46a5ef22014e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Any problem with the Ada-Comment mailing list ?
From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:52:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Received-Bytes: 2015
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1154242200
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21032
Date: 2014-07-17T15:52:45-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:41:53 PM UTC-7, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Simon Clubley wrote:
> 
> > Are there any problems with the Ada-Comment mailing list ?
> 
> Not that I know of.  I received copies of both of your proposals, and
> I've received messages on the list as late as 7 hours ago.
> 
> I think you should see the slow responses as an indication that (it is
> summer and) the proposals are sufficiently well written to warrant
> consideration at an ARG meeting.

I don't think you understood.  The slow responses he's talking about are automated responses that the list server is supposed to be providing.

After Simon posted his question, I sent a "help Ada-Comment" message to the listserv; that was 90 minutes ago and I haven't gotten a response yet.

So it's possible that there's a problem.  

                             -- Adam