From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:bd2b:: with SMTP id m43mr12086861qvg.52.1619455988844;
        Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:3816:: with SMTP id f22mr11286685yba.405.1619455988654;
 Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <77699289-3e50-4fae-a416-8ce11965f368n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=35.245.252.196; posting-account=XfA3zgkAAABoz6fRf3Tehtnqqr7Ycml-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 35.245.252.196
References: <78fd99c3-538d-4981-af11-c1885df36575n@googlegroups.com> <77699289-3e50-4fae-a416-8ce11965f368n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <984f3661-59bb-4c09-a686-d456979c54a7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Ada95] Private non-generic children of generics not allowed
From: Vincent Marciante <vincent.marciante@l3harris.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:53:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61911
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 12:41:47 PM UTC-4, AdaMagica wrote:
> Children of generic packages are also generic. 

I do understand that that is the current stipulation.  My question is rational 
for including the private children.  It seems that a child arrangement such as 
I presented (non-generic but _private_) would not have caused any problems 
and might have been allowable.  So, why not?