From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:98eb:: with SMTP id
 c40-v6mr8553282jak.32.1531787705135;
        Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f495:: with SMTP id
 s143-v6mr4349113oih.7.1531787704931;
 Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g2-v6no5752357itf.0!news-out.google.com!l67-v6ni221itl.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no5758373itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dbc745d2-ec83-457b-b6d9-4bbc7d824126@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=71.171.111.51;
 posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.171.111.51
References: <40d568da-4715-42de-8e28-98da39a5c974@googlegroups.com>
 <34f499f7-020f-4dcc-adad-0ab1113386d1@googlegroups.com>
 <b1e463c1-b715-49d4-8649-506b1a2bc265@googlegroups.com>
 <dbc745d2-ec83-457b-b6d9-4bbc7d824126@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9d69e7b5-6b2d-4607-9f7b-affa78c41620@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Visibility of Indexing aspects
From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:35:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2626
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2347255708
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53854
Date: 2018-07-16T17:35:04-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 11:22:14 PM UTC-4, AdaMagica wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 17:33:04 UTC+2 schrieb Jere:
> > That's why I started with my original question.  It seems very
> > odd that it should even be legal.  My intuition screamed bug,
> > but I couldn't find anything in the RM to say it was illegal.
> 
> What about RM 8 Visibility? 8.2(5,7,9) - all these things are not in the visible part.

I looked at that, but saw that 8.2(7), which applies in this case, 
specifically leaves out the aspect specification of what is considered 
in/out of the visible part.  It says all things within the type_declaration,
which is not defined to contain the aspect_specification (though the
full_type_declaration does).  Additionally, 8.2 only mentions aspects
in reference to scopes.  I peaked further into section 8.3 but only 
found:

8.3 (23.1/3):
An attribute_definition_clause or an aspect_specification is 
visible everywhere within its scope.

Which sounds like it should be visible even if specified in
the private part (though I am not sure I am reading it right).

The RM seems very unspecific about visibility of aspects outside of
those two spots.  What did I miss?