From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-01 00:19:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: byhoe@greenlime.com (Adrian Hoe) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to make Ada a dominant language Date: 1 Aug 2001 00:19:06 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <9ff447f2.0107312319.7f51d25f@posting.google.com> References: <3B676974.C80C72E5@sneakemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.106.197.75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 996650346 17235 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2001 07:19:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Aug 2001 07:19:06 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10921 Date: 2001-08-01T07:19:06+00:00 List-Id: Russ <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:<3B676974.C80C72E5@sneakemail.com>... > Most of the replies I received on this thread were very reasonable. A > recurring theme, however, was that syntax is trivial and not worth > discussing. I understand that the syntax is not the most important > aspect of a language, but that doesn't mean it is not worth discussing > or improving. Errr. Mistake! Syntax and lexical are the fundamental building blocks of any languages, natural or computer. Adrian Hoe > Russ Paielli