From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a875d9649dde34e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s04.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C r e e.m" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <4e8fe302b927b504b93983dba6b0d79f@localhost.talkaboutprogramming.com> <87y8imp52w.fsf@insalien.org> <4163C54F.9050700@netcabo.pt> <87sm8qmjhv.fsf_-_@insalien.org> <87oejdkvd0.fsf@insalien.org> Subject: Re: Not redistributing GNAT Pro X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s04 1097256360 24.147.74.171 (Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:26:00 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:26:00 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:26:00 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4933 Date: 2004-10-08T17:26:00+00:00 List-Id: "Ludovic Brenta" wrote in message news:87oejdkvd0.fsf@insalien.org... > "Jeff C r e e.m" writes: >> gcc 3.4.1 is pretty solid. Sure it has got a few issues here and >> there but so does ever compiler (including the supported >> versions). I recommend that people who are unable or unwilling to >> purchase the supported version move on to gcc 3.4.1 and the various >> community supported side tools (such as ASIS, Florist). > > I do not recommend this at the moment. GCC 3.4.1 is on par, > quality-wise, with GNAT 3.15p, but it still lacks Glade and requires > an extra option (-gstabs+) to generate debugging information > compatible with the Ada-aware GCC 5.3. When those two issues are > solved, I will consider GCC 3.4 as the next Debian Ada compiler. I think you mean GDB 5.3. And yes for something like Debian Stable I would agree that sticking with 3.15p probably makes sense.